I'd say the Blackbird is both aggressive and efficient.
Maybe it's bitten me because my technique with it has been lousy. Perhaps were I to do so I'd like it a lot better. The Blackbird is in my experience with it very aggressive in that it jumps up out of the bushes and bites me. I'm fine with using the word aggressive when it's then defined in context, but when it's not defined I have no idea what anyone's talking about. However, how do you know Matt now considers the Slim more aggressive than the Bronze 78?Īlso, when Matt says aggressive does he mean aggressive as in efficient or what? That is only determined by who is using it as we all know YMMV goes very far in wet shaving as what works for me might not work for you and visa versa. Now with that being said, just because a razor is aggressive doesn't necessarily mean it will be more efficient than a mild razor. ie the Blackbird would be aggressive where the Henson would be mild. Efficiency is how the razor removes stubble or growth whereas aggressiveness describes the razor in general. In my opinion, aggressiveness and efficiency are 2 completely different things but they do coexist together. Its late here and I hope this makes some level of sense to you and didn't come out like I was rambling!! 78 Bronze but because he hasn't changed the Bronze listing I think most people, and obviously you, are confused by this. He has since made the "Slim" which he now considers to be more aggressive than the. 78 Bronze he said was the most aggressive razor in the line up just as it say on the Bronze listing on the site you referenced. That is only determined by who is using it as we all know YMMV goes very far in wet shaving as what works for me might not work for you and visa versa.Īs to Matt Timeless, I saw a video at some point where he was describing the characteristics of the different razors he had and at the time the. That's my guess too, but I've used both the Slim and the Bronze 78 which confuses the issue for me I've not used either "enough" though.Ĭlick to expand.In my opinion, aggressiveness and efficiency are 2 completely different things but they do coexist together.
I wish that were universal, but it's not. I try not to use the word aggressive without defining what I mean. It seems to me you and I probably see things much the same way, but how do you know Matt's on the same page? Hopefully, you've discussed it with him. An example of that sort of razor would be the FOCS, but there are others of course.
#Timeless razor images skin#
As if an aggressive razor by definition aggressively gobbles up whiskers and skin all in one big bite.Īs I see it, a razor can be smooth feeling on the skin, not prone to biting, comfortable to use, and not irritating to the skin and at the same time it can also be efficient. I realize a lot of people use aggressive to mean some mysterious combination of what I mean by aggressive combined with efficient. Rough as opposed to smooth feeling on the skin.Not saying you're wrong here, but how do you know that's what Matt means.Īggressive to me means one or more of several things.
0 kommentar(er)
